Craziest Idea Ever

Originally posted by Deadaim Originally posted by GoDead Or you could do what they do in pro sports and go by a players stats... that way you could tell what modes they play the most and whatnot.   yea but in sports, say football.. every QB plays the same amount of games, thats why they compare stats, if rex grossman played 100 games and tom brady played 16 grossman might look better then brady because hed have alot more yards and tds

RevCrow needs to get back for it because I miss him.

to ur first and third post  notimpressed qM trained their killers hardcore style  when i first started with qM i was beyond a** but i dueled them everyday until my mistakes were almost completely gone im not going to say they are all gone cause im not perfect ...now ur third post yes i will be back it all depends on sony takin their time with my ps3 i mentioned my ps3 being fixed during a arguement i had with zellot he said i was lying well i wasnt  its in the process very slow process because hell im even takin my time with it..they sent me the ups box i didnt send it back to them until like almost a week later thats how little it means to me my feelings for the community makes me not want to play the game doesnt mean im not gunna i will when i get my ps3 back... my tv is lonely i used it mainly for movies i now actually use my dvd player hahaha

LOL :P
You think my suggestion could work?

should definitely be more than one mode - objective modes let us sheeps to the slaughter contribute more than tdm. for example, i can still translocate and take 20 off of bumrush with my enforcer before he slaughters me, while telling my teammates where he is, instead of just screaming "f***!!!" when Paw snipes my head off across the map in tdm.

Originally posted by WOPR-1 Yeah agreed that'll be the big argument wall there....the prices a**igned to players....would have to think about how to get that done in a way least prone to arguments....

What if you did something where players that are all-around would be the 'top tier' and players that usually just stick to one mode would be in the 'lower tiers'? Just an idea :)

Originally posted by Blackfang envy's pessimistic anyway so with him not in it, we have more positive people.

lol w/e phan keep on keeping on with bs hating..

Originally posted by Drokun I don't think a lot of ppl like tdm (I do, as long as it's nothing above 4v4).

more people play tdm than ctf its a fact, go look for yourself. but if its just 1 or two mades, its going to be silly and i dont want any part of that ****

Originally posted by Drokun Originally posted by Deadaim   1. well this idea woolvie brought up, shouldnt be dependent on ricos idea that died long ago. i say the mode should stay open and voted on.   4. because setting up clan matches in ut3 is like pulling nails from my experience, from 90% of the clan match related threads i see etc.   5. yea , i think it should be up to EU players as far as how they wanna do it, with US or not.. but i was more referring to the timezone diffrence then ping issues   6. competetive settings is a vague term :) 1. He never let it die, he PM'd with WOPR and they figured they'd wait until the league is over? 4. The captain's responsibility I'd say, lol 5. Oh timezone, well we usually play matches at 5 Eastern which is 11PM for me and 10PM for UK guys 6. Basically, no big head mutator 1 cap 60 minute settings. imo they should pick a mode, all modes takes too long to complete

Originally posted by _EnVy_ either all modes or im not interested...

either all modes or im not interested...

I say that if this idea is going to work, it's got to be not too big of a number, but at the same time, it's also got to be more than 2vs2, otherwise there will be not point to the "dollar" system.  3 seems like too little, 5's just asking for no shows, and 6+ is definitely not a good idea, so Deadaim's idea is just right.  The point for the value system is there and at the same time, the chance for no show issues is a lot lower, though I'm sure there still will be no show issues.  Hmm, now that I'm thinking about it maybe us clans should consider having more matches with 3 or 4 players and maybe 5 or more, but only on the good days.  It could save a lot of headaches, when we actually do have matches.

i want this idea to work here are the things that need to be ironed out tho:

1. what mode/modes?

 

2. alot of ppl claim to have little to no availbitlity.. this is a huge problem

 

3. what size teams? i tink due to #2 that the teams should be small.. 3-4 people.. but i also understand its a draft and the whole scheme is kinda cheesy with only 3 people, so my opinion is 4 is a good number.. i think alot of people might want 5.. which isnt bad but the problem is if people dont show up.

 

4. this kind of relates to #2 also.. when to play? i kinda think a cool idea would be a league night.. or tourney night.. id rather know every week to keep my wednesday nights free then argue back and forth with teams over when the match will be held and never get it accomplished.

 

5. this also relates to #2, should EU players be grouped with US players or have their own teams? (timezones etc) where as they could play in their division and meet the US players in the finals?

 

6. game settings

this seems very doable, already have a good skeleton of how things should be, it's only the small details that need to be thought out