no, never, too slowly for me. when i played halo 3 in 360 of my bro, i hated that game! i can't move where i want! ¬¬

i'm pretty sure Reach does have sprint.. there are different classes you get to choice from before the matches (like BFBC2)

I'd rather get a table dance from Trent Lott than play Halo.

Halo's a partygame
otherwise it sucks

 i like this thread

They don't actually say Halo will be on the PS3 just Bungie games....

Originally posted by SilverJ-17 If steroids means faster, with bigger guns, and an actual level builder (a step up from Halo 3's.. I forget the name, but I heard they had something that lets you edit the levels and where stuff goes.), then maybe.

halo is fun sometimes.. one reason why i don't play it is because how frustrating it is.. worst spawn points EVER

I'm still willing to give Bungie a chance.  By "Halo on steroids" they could easily mean something that surpasses anything they did on the original Xbox/ 360.  Their next FPS might not be anything like it, besides the possibility of a somewhat similar level of MLG activity and the other stuff you (Potorikan) viewed positive or somewhat positive.  In other words, I think they're intending to blow Halo away, possibly out of spite towards Microsoft.

Gay + slow = halo.  enough said. 

Potorikan,

Well, let me say from the start that I too prefer playing UT3 over Halo.  However...

Every single point you make i.e. gravity, regenerating armor etc., makes MY point that UT3 and Halo are fundamentally different games.  As you and Tuna say, it's a preference...

I just think it's ironic that you should bring up glitching as a problem in Halo when UT3 is notorious for bugs and glitches.  In fact, since UT3 came out one of the most consistent criticisms of the game has been that Epic essentially put out an unpolished beta version of the game.

As for your paragraph on Microsoft, all I can say is:  IRRELEVANT.  The only thing I care about when playing a game is if it is good or not.  I mean really, who cares if Microsoft invented it or bought a company who invented it?  Their market practices don't interest me in the least.

No my main reason for speaking up (aside from actually liking the game) is that this sight is a PS3-centric sight and it's worth, every once in a while, putting a spoke in the wheel of the bandwagon mentality that takes over on many of these threads.  Halo, because it's WAAAAY more popular and by extension, Microsoft, the arch enemy of the Playstation crowd, is an EASY target especially on a sight like this. (Not to mention Apple fanboyism.) 

And finally, let me add this, I believe, and this is my own personal opinion, that people generally like things they are good at and its opposite is true also, that is, people generally dislike those things they are NOT good at.   Wouldn't you say this is GENERALLY, true?  I can't help but have the suspicion that SOME of the people who claim that Halo requires no skill to play (not talking about you Potorikan) perhaps, were not very successful at it.  In short, they were OWNED.  But that's just me... 

Originally posted by warfare Potorikan, Well, let me say from the start that I too prefer playing UT3 over Halo.  However... Every single point you make i.e. gravity, regenerating armor etc., makes MY point that UT3 and Halo are fundamentally different games.  As you and Tuna say, it's a preference... I just think it's ironic that you should bring up glitching as a problem in Halo when UT3 is notorious for bugs and glitches.  In fact, since UT3 came out one of the most consistent criticisms of the game has been that Epic essentially put out an unpolished beta version of the game. As for your paragraph on Microsoft, all I can say is:  IRRELEVANT.  The only thing I care about when playing a game is if it is good or not.  I mean really, who cares if Microsoft invented it or bought a company who invented it?  Their market practices don't interest me in the least. No my main reason for speaking up (aside from actually liking the game) is that this sight is a PS3-centric sight and it's worth, every once in a while, putting a spoke in the wheel of the bandwagon mentality that takes over on many of these threads.  Halo, because it's WAAAAY more popular and by extension, Microsoft, the arch enemy of the Playstation crowd, is an EASY target especially on a sight like this. (Not to mention Apple fanboyism.)  And finally, let me add this, I believe, and this is my own personal opinion, that people generally like things they are good at and its opposite is true also, that is, people generally dislike those things they are NOT good at.   Wouldn't you say this is GENERALLY, true?  I can't help but have the suspicion that SOME of the people who claim that Halo requires no skill to play (not talking about you Potorikan) perhaps, were not very successful at it.  In short, they were OWNED.  But that's just me...

this is so true lol. once you start getting better at halo and you start playing people with a higher skill level it gets really really hard. unless you are on a team with skilled players with great team work and knowledge of the game then you will get ****d 90% of the time.