| | | | | |  

Forum Home Forum Home > Off Topic Forums > General Chat
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

error code 80710D36

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
ThAtSmAtT View Drop Down
Team KmA
Team KmA
Avatar
Buffalo Bill

Joined: 08 Feb 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2572
Post Options Post Options   Quote ThAtSmAtT Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: error code 80710D36
    Posted: 06 Apr 2011 at 3:45pm
^ and thats exactly why geohot along with other hackers believed what he done was not wrong... and that sony over reacted. his only reasoning for jailnbreaking his ps3 what not to steal.. but to create and play his own games... he never signed anything that never allowed him to do that
Back to Top
BAIN View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Location: New Eden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3503
Post Options Post Options   Quote BAIN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Apr 2011 at 4:03pm
Originally posted by Black Panther

Originally posted by BAIN

geoHOT may not have violated any "online agreement" but isn't Jailbreak just a way to get stuff without paying? in other words, STEALING.
 
In theory all he did was jailbreak. He never gave consent and signed away his rights. Look at it another way, if you installed linux on the ps3 , it was not illegal. What geo did is the same thing, only his program allows the ps3 to include pirated software. Pirated software he DID NOT promote.
so if this guy broke into your house, used your ps3, used your pc, used your tv, used your gerbils, but didn't steal anything then that would be all right? after all he didn't sign an agreement.
Back to Top
gr01n5h07 View Drop Down
Godlike Member
Godlike Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Location: Y0uR W1nd0W
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1193
Post Options Post Options   Quote gr01n5h07 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Apr 2011 at 4:34pm
geoHOT is a smart guy... He knew what he was doing when he made his knowledge public.  He knew that this jailbreak would be used for legitimate means as well as piracy, and also knew this would give him the fame and recognition that he desired...   Anonymous is using geoHot's misfortune as a way of legitimizing, to the public, their illegal actions and hatred towards Sony, etc.
Sony is over reacting in the attempt to deter other hackers from publishing their work /  code.
Also Black Panther should change his name back to Charlie Sheen...
Bots > Me > valjohn > Syzygy
PSN/XBL: gr01n5h07, MLP_gr01n5h07, sHoCkD_ThE_wOrLd, JFF_DuCkTaPe
Back to Top
YINYANG View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar
Ho's And Disco's

Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: -19563
Post Options Post Options   Quote YINYANG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Apr 2011 at 5:44pm
Originally posted by BAIN

Originally posted by Black Panther

Originally posted by BAIN

geoHOT may not have violated any "online agreement" but isn't Jailbreak just a way to get stuff without paying? in other words, STEALING.
 
In theory all he did was jailbreak. He never gave consent and signed away his rights. Look at it another way, if you installed linux on the ps3 , it was not illegal. What geo did is the same thing, only his program allows the ps3 to include pirated software. Pirated software he DID NOT promote.
so if this guy broke into your house, used your ps3, used your pc, used your tv, used your gerbils, but didn't steal anything then that would be all right? after all he didn't sign an agreement.
 
What he did was not a tort bain, to break and enter into someone's house is a property issue within the law and would be a tort commited against me. The ps3 was his own purchase,  he did not promote nor did he advocate the use of pirated materials. Companies reverse engineer products all the time to make them better and earn market share. In the case of Mr. Geo he simply reverse engineered a PS3 and made it public how he did it. In that sense he made a product better, furthermore, by not signing the online contract with sony he is not bound by said terms within the contract. The only contract he would have would be the one year manufacturer's warranty, which was forfitted upon him tinkering with the innards of the machine and it's software. There was no profit to be made of these actions as well.
 
Now to counter this arguement, if said person used the sony logo to promote what was done or said person promoted the use of piracy I believe this man is not only stupid but very much guilty.
 
Pinakul would be the best person to reply to this thread , he has much more knowledge in litigation than I have and would be the only person on these forums who could predict the outcome of the trial, my above statements are speculations within the law.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.72
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz