error code 80710D36 |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |||
ThAtSmAtT
Team KmA Buffalo Bill Joined: 08 Feb 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2572 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: error code 80710D36 Posted: 06 Apr 2011 at 3:45pm |
||
^ and thats exactly why geohot along with other hackers believed what he done was not wrong... and that sony over reacted. his only reasoning for jailnbreaking his ps3 what not to steal.. but to create and play his own games... he never signed anything that never allowed him to do that
|
|||
BAIN
Forum Moderator Joined: 10 Jan 2009 Location: New Eden Online Status: Offline Posts: 3503 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 06 Apr 2011 at 4:03pm | ||
|
|||
gr01n5h07
Godlike Member Joined: 17 Oct 2009 Location: Y0uR W1nd0W Online Status: Offline Posts: 1193 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 06 Apr 2011 at 4:34pm | ||
geoHOT is a smart guy... He knew what he was doing when he made his knowledge public. He knew that this jailbreak would be used for legitimate means as well as piracy, and also knew this would give him the fame and recognition that he desired... Anonymous is using geoHot's misfortune as a way of legitimizing, to the public, their illegal actions and hatred towards Sony, etc.
Sony is over reacting in the attempt to deter other hackers from publishing their work / code.
Also Black Panther should change his name back to Charlie Sheen...
|
|||
Bots > Me > valjohn > Syzygy
PSN/XBL: gr01n5h07, MLP_gr01n5h07, sHoCkD_ThE_wOrLd, JFF_DuCkTaPe |
|||
YINYANG
Forum Moderator Ho's And Disco's Joined: 19 Mar 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: -19563 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 06 Apr 2011 at 5:44pm | ||
What he did was not a tort bain, to break and enter into someone's house is a property issue within the law and would be a tort commited against me. The ps3 was his own purchase, he did not promote nor did he advocate the use of pirated materials. Companies reverse engineer products all the time to make them better and earn market share. In the case of Mr. Geo he simply reverse engineered a PS3 and made it public how he did it. In that sense he made a product better, furthermore, by not signing the online contract with sony he is not bound by said terms within the contract. The only contract he would have would be the one year manufacturer's warranty, which was forfitted upon him tinkering with the innards of the machine and it's software. There was no profit to be made of these actions as well.
Now to counter this arguement, if said person used the sony logo to promote what was done or said person promoted the use of piracy I believe this man is not only stupid but very much guilty.
Pinakul would be the best person to reply to this thread , he has much more knowledge in litigation than I have and would be the only person on these forums who could predict the outcome of the trial, my above statements are speculations within the law.
|
|||
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |